We'll soon see if this report is true. Sounds like tabloid fodder. If Jackson was sad and wanted to make things right with Paul, why put it in his will? Why not make amends with Paul while he was alive? The man has three children, was in debt up to his ears. Does anyone truly think he would think of Paul McCartney over the future of his own children and just give away 25% (which is all he now owned) of the most expensive and lucrative song catalogue in history to someone he hasn't spoken to in years?
Submitted by Susan (not verified) on June 25, 2009 - 11:49pm.
We'll soon see if this
We'll soon see if this report is true. Sounds like tabloid fodder. If Jackson was sad and wanted to make things right with Paul, why put it in his will? Why not make amends with Paul while he was alive? The man has three children, was in debt up to his ears. Does anyone truly think he would think of Paul McCartney over the future of his own children and just give away 25% (which is all he now owned) of the most expensive and lucrative song catalogue in history to someone he hasn't spoken to in years?