The only reason he voted against it is because it isn't "progressive" (read as Socialist) enough. I almost sent him a thank you email, but after trying to read his explanation, I'm glad I didn't.
He didn't vote against it because the science doesn't support what this bill is trying to fight, or because he didn't agree with the huge tax and cost burdens to the voters of his district.
How the hell this guy wins re-election every time out after running Cleveland into the ground is beyond me. Oh, wait, I know why. Because the people in this area re just plain dumb, and if they see a name they recognize with a 'D' after it they are going to vote for it.
Submitted by Brent (not verified) on June 29, 2009 - 4:08pm.
The only reason he voted
The only reason he voted against it is because it isn't "progressive" (read as Socialist) enough. I almost sent him a thank you email, but after trying to read his explanation, I'm glad I didn't.
He didn't vote against it because the science doesn't support what this bill is trying to fight, or because he didn't agree with the huge tax and cost burdens to the voters of his district.
How the hell this guy wins re-election every time out after running Cleveland into the ground is beyond me. Oh, wait, I know why. Because the people in this area re just plain dumb, and if they see a name they recognize with a 'D' after it they are going to vote for it.